Skip to content
FaultcodeCheck

Ideal H F fault codewhat it means and how to fix it

Get it checkedBoilerIsar HE, Icos HE, Mexico HE, Esprit HE, Esprit 2 and EliseLast updated

The flame detection electrode on an Isar, Icos, Mexico HE or Esprit has failed Ideal's continuity test — a short circuit, in the Icos wording. The electrode is replaced, or the board.

Take care

Some of this is safe to check yourself, but the repair itself is not. If the fault comes back after one reset, stop resetting it and get a Gas Safe registered engineer to look at the Ideal properly.

Get a Gas Safe registered engineer to look at your Ideal H F

We do not pass enquiries to a repair firm, so there is no form here. Find a Gas Safe registered engineer through the Gas Safe Register, and ask to see their registration card when they arrive — it is the register, not the van, that tells you they are qualified.

What H F means

H F is Flame Detection Error in its temporary form, and it is not L F. L F is the lockout after three failed ignitions; H F is the board reporting that the flame detection circuit itself is wrong before or between attempts, which the Icos manual spells out as Flame Detection — Short Circuit Error. The detection electrode is the probe that sits in the flame and carries the tiny ionisation current that proves the burner is alight. If that probe or its lead is shorted to earth, or the board's input has failed, the boiler can never prove a flame and will not try.

Ideal's chart is two questions long: remove the flame detection electrode terminal from the PCB and check for continuity between the two terminal pins — if there is continuity, replace the flame detection electrode; if there is not, replace the PCB. The Logic family has no direct equivalent; a detection electrode fault on a Logic surfaces as a failed ignition, L2, rather than as its own code, which makes H F the more helpful message of the two for an engineer.

What causes it

Causes of the Ideal H F fault code, most common first
CauseWhat is actually happeningHow likely
Detection electrode shorted or crackedThe ceramic insulator on the probe cracks with heat cycling and the lead earths to the casing. Ideal's continuity test finds it directly.Common
Lead chafed or terminal corrodedThe electrode lead runs beside the burner. A lead that has cooked, or a terminal that has corroded in condensate, reads the same as a failed probe.Occasional
PCB flame-sensing inputNo continuity at the electrode, and H F still showing: Ideal's chart replaces the board.Rare

Can you fix it yourself?

What it costs to fix

Typical repair cost

£80–£380

Time on site

40 minutes

A flame detection electrode £80–£150 fitted. A PCB, if the electrode passes Ideal's test, £200–£380.

Typical UK prices including parts and labour, updated September 2026. Your quote may differ.

Parts you may need

We may earn a commission if you buy a part through one of these links. It does not change what you pay, and it does not affect which parts we list.

Ideal Logic ignition electrode

175565£18–£42Authorised Ideal parts distributor

Price checked 28 September 2026

Ideal Logic primary PCB

£150–£320Authorised Ideal parts distributor

Price checked 28 September 2026

Own this appliance and had this code? . Nothing is published until a person has read it.

Common questions about Ideal H F

What is the difference between H F and L F?

L F is the ignition lockout: three attempts, no flame proved, boiler latched off until reset. H F is the flame detection circuit itself reporting a fault, usually a shorted electrode. One is a result, the other is a component telling you why.

Will it clear by itself?

H codes can, and an intermittent short — a lead touching the casing only when hot — produces an H F that comes and goes. It is not a code that fixes itself, only one that hides for a while.

Is this the electrode that gets changed at a service?

On these boilers the ignition and detection electrodes are separate parts, and Ideal's chart for H F concerns the detection one. It is a routine replacement and a modest bill.

Written by

Andrew Pickett

Researcher and writer

Last updated

Technical review

Not reviewed by an engineer

No engineer has read this page. Severity follows what the manufacturer publishes, and we would rather tell you that than let a byline imply a sign-off.

What we check instead

Sources and how we verified this

We establish the facts from the sources below and then write the explanation ourselves. We do not copy manufacturer wording and we do not host their manuals.

  • Manufacturer technical and service documentation

This page has not been reviewed by an engineer, and we would rather tell you that than imply otherwise. The severity rating follows what the manufacturer publishes: where they say isolate the appliance and call someone, so do we.

Read our full verification process

Was this page helpful?