Skip to content
FaultcodeCheck

Vaillant F.97 fault codewhat it means and how to fix it

Get it checkedBoilerecoFIT pure and sustain, ecoTEC sustain, open-vent ecoTEC plus and the 48–64 kW ecoTEC plus; ecoTEC plus CS/1-5 as F.097. Not in the ecoTEC plus ..6/5-5, pro, exclusive or legacy tables.Last updated

Vaillant's main PCB has failed the check it runs on itself. The table gives one cause, "main PCB defective", and one remedy: replace the PCB.

Take care

Some of this is safe to check yourself, but the repair itself is not. If the fault comes back after one reset, stop resetting it and get a Gas Safe registered engineer to look at the Vaillant properly.

Get a Gas Safe registered engineer to look at your Vaillant F.97

We do not pass enquiries to a repair firm, so there is no form here. Find a Gas Safe registered engineer through the Gas Safe Register, and ask to see their registration card when they arrive — it is the register, not the van, that tells you they are qualified.

What F.97 means

Most Vaillant codes have a check list. F.97 has a sentence. The ecoFIT pure and sustain, the ecoTEC sustain, the open-vent ecoTEC plus and the 48–64 kW plus all print "main PCB self-test failed — main PCB defective", and the 48–64 kW table and the 2022 CS/1-5 add the only instruction there is: "replace the PCB".

At every power-up, and again while running, the PCB tests the circuits it depends on for safety, and F.97 means one of those tests did not pass. Since the flame-proving and gas-valve circuits are among them, a board that has failed its test will not run, and no setting or reset overrides that.

What a householder can usefully know is what F.97 is not. It is not the display losing contact with the board — that is "con" on the two-digit ranges and F.707 on the CS/1-5, and it can look similar because both leave the boiler dead. It is not the electronics overheating, which is F.65 and clears when the board cools. F.97 is the PCB declaring itself unfit. The row is not printed on the ecoTEC plus ..6/5-5, pro or exclusive tables, and not on any legacy range.

What causes it

Causes of the Vaillant F.97 fault code, most common first
CauseWhat is actually happeningHow likely
Main PCB defectiveVaillant's only cause. A component in the board's safety circuits has failed and the self-test detects it.Common
Water or condensation on the boardA leak from above onto the electronics box is the commonest way a good board becomes a failed one. An engineer looks for the source before fitting the replacement.Occasional
Mains disturbanceA surge or a prolonged brown-out can damage the board. Vaillant do not list it for F.97; it is the usual history behind a board that fails without a leak.Rare

Can you fix it yourself?

What it costs to fix

Typical repair cost

£250–£400

Time on site

1 hour

A replacement PCB is £250 to £400 fitted. If a leak caused it, the leak is a separate repair.

Typical UK prices including parts and labour, updated September 2026. Your quote may differ.

Parts you may need

We may earn a commission if you buy a part through one of these links. It does not change what you pay, and it does not affect which parts we list.

Vaillant main PCB (electronics box)

£160–£340Authorised Vaillant parts distributor

Price checked 28 September 2026

Own this appliance and had this code? . Nothing is published until a person has read it.

Common questions about Vaillant F.97

Is there anything to try before calling?

Switching the boiler off at its isolator for a minute and back on lets the board run its self-test again. If F.97 returns, Vaillant's remedy is a new board and nothing short of it will clear the code.

How much is a new board?

Typically £250 to £400 fitted for an ecoFIT or ecoTEC sustain. Check whether the boiler is inside Vaillant's guarantee first; the board is the part most worth claiming.

Is F.97 the same as "con"?

No. "con" is the display unable to talk to a board that may be working. F.97 is the board itself reporting a failed self-test. Both need an engineer, but F.97 nearly always means a board.

Written by

Andrew Pickett

Researcher and writer

Last updated

Technical review

Not reviewed by an engineer

No engineer has read this page. Severity follows what the manufacturer publishes, and we would rather tell you that than let a byline imply a sign-off.

What we check instead

Sources and how we verified this

We establish the facts from the sources below and then write the explanation ourselves. We do not copy manufacturer wording and we do not host their manuals.

  • Manufacturer technical and service documentation

This page has not been reviewed by an engineer, and we would rather tell you that than imply otherwise. The severity rating follows what the manufacturer publishes: where they say isolate the appliance and call someone, so do we.

Read our full verification process

Was this page helpful?